mOtive isn’t everything
Posted in histOry on April 29th, 2011 by The Wayward OWith recent tail-between-legs quit of Manny Ramirez from Game as result of inability to adhere to league’s newish substance policies, baseball’s Steroid Era finally has begun to wind into Post-Steroid Era.
Over many years Blog of Team has had many discussions with many fans who have many different takes on steroids and other performance-aiding drugs.
Some fans just don’t care that much, discounting notion that they help players play better.
Others accept as fact that steroids give players competitive advantage but suggest steroid use is less of sin than others that in past have given Game its blackest of eyes.
Still others believe that steroid use confers huge unfair advantage to players who use them and believe in retribution against players who use them, regardless of whether they ever “come clean,” up to and including denial of Hall of Fame eligibility.
Blog believes current players who have been forthcoming about their steroid use deserve benefit of doubt from fans and league that they won’t use them going forward.
Reason for this is because during height of abuses many players were pressured by coaches and others to use them and may have concluded that their shot at solid Major League career depended on it. This climate of abuse doesn’t make them innocent, but must be acknowledged.
That said, Blog dearly hopes baseball’s testing policy remains robust going forward.
Players who flouted their obvious use of steroids, lied about it, made up excuses for it or otherwise failed to admit their transgressions, Blog believes, deserve legal and popular scrutiny. Blog is thinking of Ramirez, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Rafael Palmeiro for four examples.
Blog understands to limited degree notion that “cheating to win is better than cheating to lose” and that steroid users who seek or sought to improve their on-field performance probably would inhabit a lesser circle of offense than, say, those Chicago players who threw World Series for money way back when or — possibly — Pete Rose, who it’s said would play in games after betting against his Reds.
But problems with this line of thinking as view toward forgiving steroid users, whether repentant or not, are twofold:
First, like any business, any and all cheating undermines business integrity. Baseball, above all else, needs to protect implicit notion that people paying for product can trust product’s integrity.
Second, regardless of whether steroid use confers unfair advantage, it’s likely that people willing to “cheat to win” also would more likely be willing to ”cheat to lose.”
To put it another way: Motive isn’t everything, especially if said cheaters are in fact gaining unfair advantage. If you have unfair advantage there’s little or nothing to stop you from undermining integrity of game in ways that benefit you on any given day.






