Sox by Prox: I like it
The Wayward O: It’s fun to do
Sox by Prox: Have you considered adding uncertainty negative points?
The Wayward O: [Blog thinks] there’s an underlying assumption that all teams in playoffs have liabilities
Sox by Prox: Makes sense. Playing a little devil’s advocate
The Wayward O: Got any examples in mind?
Sox by Prox: Not really. I was thinking if the Yankees had to wind up starting someone like A.J. Burnett
The Wayward O: Even a Burnett sighting would fall under umbrella of randomness
People that give [Blog] most sh*t about system are statheads who hate RBI. But RBI qualifier, because it looks at past as opposed to future, helps avoid arbitrary cap on how many games a guy has to have played to be considered. That said, it’s still a bit arbitrary
Sox by Prox: Well it would have to be, right? Any time you’re going to make a judgment about stats, you’re going to have to draw an “arbitrary” line somewhere
I’m not a big baseball guy, but the 100 RBI doesn’t bother me. My biggest question is the 54 home wins. Why 54?
The Wayward O: It says you win two out of every three home games. To me it translates to certainty
Sox by Prox: Got it
The Wayward O: You’d be surprised how hard that is to do. Only Milwaukee did it this year
[Blog supposes] if someone ever managed some sick number of road wins, there could be a point in there for them too.
Sox by Prox: 3/5 maybe
The Wayward O: One criteria [Blog] had when figuring out what would be worth looking at was: Was it hard? Was it difficult?Like 3/5 notion a lot. Bet few if any teams have a .600 road win percentage, which would be 49 road wins [checks Baseball Reference] Philly was only MLB team this year to eclipse that mark with 50 road wins
But even if you gave Philly another point this year it doesn’t affect seedings